Prep me for

Doug

Engineering counterpart — S2, venue path, infrastructure

FIXTURE / TEST DATA · Command-center snapshot 24 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC. This view is not current Tony OS state. Live operating facts are served by the conversational console. Source: FIXTURE / TEST DATA. Dated command-center snapshot captured 24 Aug 2026 from live Tony O
Meeting objective
FACT
  • Resolve the Peter transition conflict, recover the dated report-back, and pin the next evidence action that actually moves G-1 / G-3.
Where things stood last time
FACT
  • Tony × Doug on 21 Aug 14:33 UTC covered contributor compensation, the Peter transition, and Tony's conditional personal-funding backup. Infrastructure Collaboration the same day floated a Doug–Ramy login/auth working session without a fixed day.
Doug owes Tony
KNOWN COMMITMENT
  • Speak with Peter to confirm transition arrangement terms, then report back (overdue 21 Aug).
  • Investigate WebKit keep-alive / always-on feasibility on iOS and Android (undated).
  • Report observed S2V2S defects is owed to Tony from a prior meeting — confirm whether Doug is the actor.
Tony owes Doug
KNOWN COMMITMENT
  • Obtain the client audio-source questionnaire from Doug.
  • Follow up with Rami and Doug on role-description language.
Open decisions / approvals
FACT
  • DEC-G03-PATH — server vs on-device vs hybrid. Not Tony-queued; still open.
  • DEC-025 — venue access claims conflict.
Relevant program facts
FACT
  • G-1, G-2, G-3 are OPEN and CURRENTLY ARMING. Evidence Verified 0 / 29.
  • G-3 next evidence action: define uplink-contention measurement protocol so the first venue visit captures it.
  • Thin client currently streams audio unauthenticated. A/B toggle exists and has not been run.
Conflicts / watch-outs
DERIVED FORECAST / RISK
  • Tony and Doug hold different understandings of the Peter arrangement's duration and structure.
  • Venue access is conflicting in the program record.
Questions to ask
  1. 1Did you speak with Peter, and what exact terms did he confirm?
  2. 2What date and artifact close the WebKit keep-alive investigation?
  3. 3What measured evidence would you accept as deciding server versus on-device?
  4. 4Is the S1 witnessed baseline booked, or only discussed?
  5. 5Where is the audio-source questionnaire, and what is stale in it?
  6. 6Who owns the first bench-to-room protocol, and is a date booked?
  7. 7Which S2V2S defects are already written down versus still verbal?
  8. 8What would make you unwilling to retire S1?
Do not leave without
A report-back on the Peter terms (owner: Doug) or an explicit new committed date — plus one named next evidence action for G-1 or G-3, without inventing an owner if none is stated.